tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post6186727346122326046..comments2007-10-15T06:49:02.309-05:00Devil's Advocatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01196843635891254969CopiousDissent@gmail.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-82191344336859583182007-10-15T06:49:00.000-05:002007-10-15T06:49:00.000-05:00Making your type bold doesn't make it more true.<BR/><BR/>Your "scientists" take in billions upon billions in grant money. They have more of a vested interest in the skeptics who often aren't paid by corporations.<BR/><BR/>In fact, those sceptics are more believable for that reason.<BR/><BR/>Nevertheless, I like how you never addressed the lies and simply talked about corporations. This may be accepted in today's universities, but in truth is makes for a really weak argument.Devil's Advocatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01196843635891254969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-27270865018435738002007-10-15T02:04:00.000-05:002007-10-15T02:04:00.000-05:00I just love how this blog takes CORPORATE LOBBIED "science" as a reason to dispute facts. It should come as no surprise to anyone with half a brain that any time the government uses research for its own self interest, that research will be sponsored by THE CORPORATOCRACY.<BR/><BR/>The fight to ban the film being shown in schools was entirely funded by a powerful network of business interests with close links to the fuel and mining lobbies:<BR/><BR/>http://tinyurl.com/2ed4gx<BR/><BR/>WILL THE NEXT ARTICLE ON THIS BLOG BE ABOUT HOW SMOKING DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER? AFTER ALL THE RESEARCHERS AT PHILLIP MORRIS HAVE ASSURED US THAT IT DOES NOT!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-79417702968651465182007-10-12T11:56:00.000-05:002007-10-12T11:56:00.000-05:00Just LOVE IT!!!FedUpnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-32552200567553689552007-10-11T12:02:00.000-05:002007-10-11T12:02:00.000-05:00Yes, it is the British Government.<BR/><BR/>And declaring that they are backwards without providing justification isn't an argument.<BR/><BR/>You liberals seem to be the type who advocate questioning authority, and yet when children are forced to watch a propaganda film, you think questioning the flaws of the movie are backwards...I find it ironic.Devil's Advocatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01196843635891254969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-33518096822066510932007-10-11T11:56:00.000-05:002007-10-11T11:56:00.000-05:00who is "the government" in this article? what ass-backwards people live in this country? the british government?<BR/><BR/>are you guys as much of a sell out as us americans?<BR/><BR/>what a stupid farking articleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-43650879661908888662007-10-10T17:22:00.000-05:002007-10-10T17:22:00.000-05:00You're an abject failure as a researcher.<BR/><BR/>The article you "Googled" was from over a year ago and has since been debunked.<BR/><BR/>I'm sorry just because National Geographic sites garbage science doesn't make it fact.<BR/><BR/>Maybe you should stay up-to-date with the data.Devil's Advocatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01196843635891254969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-26135103917128626852007-10-10T17:12:00.000-05:002007-10-10T17:12:00.000-05:00I just picked a random argument in there and punched it into Google to see for myself if these debunks are true.<BR/><BR/>Very first one I researched, on the very first hit, countered what this article says for that item.<BR/><BR/>7. The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.<BR/><BR/>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/warming-coral_2.html<BR/><BR/>I found it! Why can't a friggin' govt use Google?<BR/><BR/>After seeing that, I no felt a desire to look any further. Please delete this post.<BR/><BR/>This is NOT a great find. And calling SCIENTISTS "cultists" is beyond comical.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-59231739872755757752007-10-10T15:33:00.000-05:002007-10-10T15:33:00.000-05:00This is a GREAT find !!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1535994472721452108.post-73124406340290101112007-10-10T15:12:00.000-05:002007-10-10T15:12:00.000-05:00Very good news.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, it is unlikely that anyone in the alarmist camp will engage these points in a meaningful way. No, James Hanson, Al Gore, and their cult-like following will either claim that the judge is an idiot or bought off, or they will pretend that this never happened.<BR/><BR/>We can only hope that someone with some clout will give this ruling the attention that it deserves.jchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13489451325369717506noreply@blogger.com